The #1 aim for any organization is self-preservation. When people feel things are & they are getting by they are fine with squeezing out more efficiency in what they do & figuring out ways to pay the bills. But when people feel the table is tilted at some point they cease caring & do whatever it takes.
Some longtime Ad Words advertisers have recently been punished for affiliate ads they ran 8 years ago where a number of the sites they promoted at some point fell out of Google's graces through an commercial method which never lets you delete your history & offers ex post facto regulations that turn a regular advertiser arbitrarily in to a spammer.
In two weeks it will have been two months since Google first launched Panda. Outside of bloggers with 50,000 RSS subscribers few (if any) reports of recovery from Panda have been seen. A quantity of the theories floating around what caused Panda try to tie it to Ad Sense & lots of Google's Ad Sense case studies are now highlighting best practices to follow in case you need to be like the sites Google torched.
I won't run Ad Sense on our main sections of this site because it would be tacky & damage perceived credibility (having a "submit your site to 2000 search engines for $29" commercial next to the content doesn't inspire trust on an SEO site). I could generate a content farm answers section of the site that mirrors Asks strategy, but with a higher level of quality. I won't though, because it would be viewed as spam because I am me. One time again, SEOs ought to be held to a higher standard than search engines. ;)
As if that wasn't conflicting, a number of the site owners that were torched by Panda received automated messages that they were missing out on revenues by not using the maximum allotted number of commercial units. After the giant fall off from Panda, Google has been pushing Ad Sense so hard that plenty of site owners have been receiving unsolicited emails from Google proposing they sign up for Ad Sense.
Some longtime Ad Words advertisers have recently been punished for affiliate ads they ran 8 years ago where a number of the sites they promoted at some point fell out of Google's graces through an commercial method which never lets you delete your history & offers ex post facto regulations that turn a regular advertiser arbitrarily in to a spammer.
In two weeks it will have been two months since Google first launched Panda. Outside of bloggers with 50,000 RSS subscribers few (if any) reports of recovery from Panda have been seen. A quantity of the theories floating around what caused Panda try to tie it to Ad Sense & lots of Google's Ad Sense case studies are now highlighting best practices to follow in case you need to be like the sites Google torched.
I won't run Ad Sense on our main sections of this site because it would be tacky & damage perceived credibility (having a "submit your site to 2000 search engines for $29" commercial next to the content doesn't inspire trust on an SEO site). I could generate a content farm answers section of the site that mirrors Asks strategy, but with a higher level of quality. I won't though, because it would be viewed as spam because I am me. One time again, SEOs ought to be held to a higher standard than search engines. ;)
As if that wasn't conflicting, a number of the site owners that were torched by Panda received automated messages that they were missing out on revenues by not using the maximum allotted number of commercial units. After the giant fall off from Panda, Google has been pushing Ad Sense so hard that plenty of site owners have been receiving unsolicited emails from Google proposing they sign up for Ad Sense.
0 comments:
Post a Comment